Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150 Assignment 1: Historical Perspective
Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Discuss the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Indicate the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Did not submit or incompletely indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy. Partially discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Partially indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy. Satisfactorily discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Satisfactorily indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy. Thoroughly discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Thoroughly indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.
2. Analyze the social, economic, and political environments for the times the policy was discussed or implemented.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the times the policy was discussed or implemented. Partially analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the times the policy discussed or implemented. Satisfactorily analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the times the policy was discussed or implemented. Thoroughly analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the times the policy was discussed or implemented.
3. Critique the policy for its effectiveness of the time.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time. Partially critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time. Satisfactorily critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time. Thoroughly critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time.
4. 4-5 References

Weight: 5%

Does not meet the required number of references Meets the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references good quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity and writing mechanics

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Comments are closed.