AsBenchmark – Acquiring Employees

AsBenchmark – Acquiring Employees

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content  
35.0 %Needs Assessment (C:2.3) A needs assessment is not included. A needs assessment is included, but it is incomplete or lacks detail. A needs assessment is included and the matrix is complete, but the needs assessment minimally addresses areas for potential growth. A detailed needs assessment is included and the matrix is thorough and complete. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes at least one example from each area analyzed. A comprehensive needs assessment is included and the matrix is well developed. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes multiple examples from each area analyzed.
35.0 %Job Descriptions Two job descriptions are not included. One or two job descriptions are included, but they are incomplete or lack detail. Two job descriptions are included. A job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions. Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions. Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions. The job descriptions are clear and well developed to appeal to potential candidates.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage  

asignment 2 Rubrics


Comments are closed.