Benchmark – Policy Action Plan

Benchmark – Policy Action Plan

Top of Form

Benchmark – Policy Action Plan 

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content  
5.0 %Stakeholders listed Stakeholders are missing. Stakeholders are incomplete. Stakeholders are complete. Stakeholders are complete and clear. Stakeholders are clear and concise.
10.0 %Required resources and who provides the resources Required resources and who provides them are missing. Required resources and who provides them are incomplete. Required resources and who provides them are complete. Required resources and who provides them are complete and clear. Required resources and who provides them are clear and concise.
10.0 %Challenges that might be encountered Challenges that might be encountered are missing. Challenges that might be encountered are incomplete or vague and inconsistent. Challenges that might be encountered are complete. Challenges that might be encountered are complete and clear. Challenges that might be encountered are clear, concise, and makes some connection to research.
5.0 %Time frame of implementation Time frame of implementation is missing. Time frame of implementation is incomplete. Time frame of implementation is complete. Time frame of implementation is complete and clear. Time frame of implementation is clear and concise.
10.0 %Evaluation process Evaluation process is missing. Evaluation process is incomplete or vague and inconsistent. Evaluation process is complete. Evaluation process is complete and clear. Evaluation process is clear, concise, and makes connections to research.
10.0 %Summarize how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted. Describe the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders. (Comp 3.3) Summary of how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted, including a description of the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders is missing. Summary of how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted, including a description of the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders is vague and inconsistent. Summary of how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted, including a description of the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders is complete and present. Summary of how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted, including a description of the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders is present and clear. Summary of how agencies, personnel, and public involved in the implementation of the policy will be impacted, including a description of the considerations needed for seamless implementation of the policy for all stakeholders is clear, concise and makes connections to research.
30.0 %Presentation of Content The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
10.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage  

Bottom of Form


Comments are closed.